*I*nference, Optimal Stopping and New Hypotheses

**nference, Optimal Stopping and New Hypotheses**

*I*### Boris Babic, University of Toronto

**Abstract: ** *Boris Babic, Anil Gaba, Ilia Tsetlin and Robert L. Winkler*

In this project we address the Bayesian problem of new hypotheses and attempt to reframe normative constraints for rational inference in situations characterized by substantial unawareness about the possible outcomes. In particular, we first argue that we can meaningfully distinguish two types of learning scenarios: problem framing and problem solving. Problem solving is the sort of thing we do when we have quite a bit of information about a problem—enough to identify the relevant outcomes, and sometimes to even put some meaningful prior probabilities on them. Problem framing is what happens when we encounter an issue for more or less the first time. For example, one steps into an organic chemistry class without any background knowledge of the underlying subject matter. In cases like these, it’s unreasonable to expect such an agent to be aware of what she might learn, let alone to place probabilities on possible learning outcomes.

Problem framing, we will suggest, is the “hard” problem of learning. Problem solving is “easy.” And while Bayesianism (or, more specifically, traditional Bayesian confirmation theory in philosophy of science) is often pitched as a theory of rational learning, it is a persuasive normative theory of problem solving only. For framing problems, we need to look elsewhere. We will propose a slightly different set of normative criteria by drawing on principles of optimal stopping. Instead of having an agent do something they are not in a position to do (place probabilities on unanticipated hypotheses), we will have them instead focus on more tractable aspects of the learning situation (e.g., evaluate the importance of the problem, the upside if it proves fruitful, the downside if it is a waste of time). This will yield different normative criteria for rational inference. We will also consider whether this is better thought of as a non-Bayesian approach to learning, or just a reframing of the traditional Bayesian paradigm.